Editorial Type:
Article Category: Case Report
 | 
Online Publication Date: 08 Mar 2021

Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis From Gallbladder Cancer After Curative Resection: A Case Report and Review of Literature

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
Page Range: 138 – 143
DOI: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-21-00006.1
Save
Download PDF

Introduction

Only 12 cases of gallbladder (GB) cancer associated with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) have been reported so far. Herein, we report the first known case of LMC originating from GB cancer after curative resection and discuss the risk factors of LMC associated with GB cancer.

Case Presentation

An 85-year-old Japanese woman presented with vomiting and impaired awareness 2 years after curative extended cholecystectomy for GB cancer. Computed tomography showed hydronephrosis of the right kidney and ureteral thickening. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed areas of hyperintense reflecting lesions along the cerebral sulci, suggesting meningitis. A spinal tap showed an elevated cerebrospinal fluid pressure of >270 mmH2O and cytologic examination of the spinal fluid revealed the presence of adenocarcinoma cells. The patient was diagnosed with retroperitoneal metastasis and LMC originating from GB cancer. The patient was given palliative care and died 4 weeks after the onset of symptoms.

Conclusion

The findings of this study show that LMC could occur even after curative resection of GB cancer and should be considered when patients present with neurologic symptoms. Retroperitoneal metastases and poorly differentiated tumors are possible risk factors of LMC originating from GB cancer.

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) is a rare metastatic complication of gallbladder (GB) cancer. The common causes of solid tumor-related LMC are breast cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma.1 Only 12 cases of GB cancer associated with LMC have been reported in the literature. Furthermore, LMC after curative resection has not been reported. A rare case of LMC from GB cancer after curative resection is reported herein, and the risk factors of LMC associated with GB cancer are discussed.

Case Presentation

An 85-year-old Japanese woman presented with vomiting and impaired consciousness 2 years after undergoing extended cholecystectomy with parapancreatic lymph node dissection for the GB cancer. The resected GB tumor was a 75 × 60 mm flat-infiltrating tumor whose surface was covered by papillary extension (Fig. 1a). Histopathologic examination showed well-differentiated and poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas invading the subserosal layer (Fig. 1b–d). Mild lymphatic invasion was detected, but lymph node metastases were not detected. All surgical margins were cancer free. The tumor was classified as pT2bN0M0, pStageIIB in accordance with the Union for International Cancer Control TNM staging system (eighth edition). The patient was cancer-free and did not require postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for 2 years. However, on readmission, her Glasgow Coma Scale was E3V4M6 (13/15). Systemic computed tomography (CT) showed hydronephrosis of the right kidney and ureteral thickening (Fig. 2a, b). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed areas of hyperintense reflecting lesions along the cerebral sulci, suggestive of meningitis (Fig. 2c). A spinal tap showed increased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure of >270 mmH2O. Cytologic examination of the CSF revealed the presence of adenocarcinoma cells (Fig. 3). Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were elevated at 18.3 ng/mL (normal value, <4.5 ng/mL), but carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level was within the normal range. Cytologic examination of the patient's urine was negative for malignancy. Endoscopic and radiologic findings did not indicate any signs of malignancy. Therefore, the patient was diagnosed with retroperitoneal metastasis and LMC originating from the GB. She died 4 weeks after the initial presentation without further treatment.

Fig. 1Fig. 1Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Histopathologic findings. (a) A flat-infiltrating tumor covered with papillary expansions is shown. (b) Cancer cells are shown invading the subserosal layer (hematoxylin and eosin, ×40). (c) Components of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma are shown (hematoxylin and eosin, ×200). (d) Components of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma are visible (hematoxylin and eosin, ×200).

Citation: International Surgery 106, 3; 10.9738/INTSURG-D-21-00006.1

Fig. 2Fig. 2Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Imaging findings. (a, b) Computed tomography shows hydronephrosis in the right kidney (arrow in a) and ureteral thickening (arrow in b). (c) Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain shows hyperintense areas of lesions along the cerebral sulcus (arrows).

Citation: International Surgery 106, 3; 10.9738/INTSURG-D-21-00006.1

Fig. 3Fig. 3Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Cytologic findings. Cytology of cerebrospinal fluid shows adenocarcinoma cells (Papanicolaou ×400).

Citation: International Surgery 106, 3; 10.9738/INTSURG-D-21-00006.1

Discussion

LMC occurs in 5%–8% of patients with solid tumors.2 The most common solid tumors associated with LMC are breast cancer (12%–35%), lung cancer (10%–26%), and melanoma (5%–25%).1 In East Asia, gastric cancer has been reported to be the principal etiology of LMC.3,4 Thus far, only 12 cases of LMC originating from GB cancer have been reported in the literature.515 Furthermore, no cases of LMC after curative resection have been reported. LMC results in variable clinical presentations. The common symptoms are radicular pain, cranial nerve deficits, headache, back pain, visual impairments, hearing loss, and neurocognitive syndromes.16 During advanced stages, symptoms caused by elevated intracranial pressure include headaches, nausea or vomiting, and somnolence appear.16 According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines for Central Nervous System Cancers, a diagnosis of LMC can be made if one of the following diagnostic criteria is positive: presence of tumor cells in the CSF, positive radiologic findings with supportive clinical findings, or signs and CSF symptoms suggestive of or positive for malignancy (high white blood cell count, low glucose level, and elevated protein level) in a patient known to have cancer.17 If CSF cytology is negative for tumor cells, a second lumbar puncture should be considered. The positive rate of confirmed malignancy using CSF cytology is >50% from the first tap;18 however, it may increase to approximately >90% in the second tap.19 MRI is reported to be a useful modality for LMC detection. MRI was found to have higher sensitivity and specificity in LMC detection than contrast-enhanced CT.20 Positron emission tomography (PET) may be an alternative imaging modality for diagnosing LMC in patients who are unable to undergo MRI and or a spinal tap or in cases where initial MRI and or CSF cytology were negative for LMC.21 Therefore, in a case of suspected LMC, cranial or spinal MRI and a spinal tap should be performed. In the present case, positive CSF cytology and MRI findings met the LMC diagnosis criteria. In 11 of the 12 previously reported cases,515 LMC was diagnosed by performing CSF cytology (Table 1).

Table 1 LMC originating from GB cancer
Table 1

Treatments of LMC are limited and often ineffective, mostly due to limitations imposed by the blood-brain barrier and the extremely aggressive nature of this disease. Most untreated patients with LMC die within 4–6 weeks after diagnosis.22 The median survival time has increased to 13–25 weeks due to various treatments, such as intraventricular and intrathecal chemotherapy.23 In previously reported cases,515 7 untreated patients died within 2–10 weeks, while 6 treated patients died within 9–24 weeks (Table 1).

The pathways by which neoplastic cells reach the meninges are unknown. Proposed routes include the Batson venous plexus of paravertebral veins, arterial circulation, direct extension along perineural spaces, or paradoxical embolization.24 Metastases in or near the vertebrae act as an intermediate station for tumor cells before they are further propagated into the central nervous system.24 In the present case, metastasis in the retroperitoneal space was the only metastatic site except for LMC. It is hypothesized that tumor cells in the retroperitoneal space may have reached the meninges through the paravertebral Batson venous plexus or directly along perineural invasion. In 9 of the 12 previously reported cases,515 metastatic lesions were found in the retroperitoneal space (Table 1). Therefore, Retroperitoneal metastases may be risk factors of LMC originating from GB cancer.

The question arises as to how the tumor cells reached the right ureter in the retroperitoneal space. We hypothesized that the right ureter was exposed when the Kocher manoeuvre was conducted during parapancreatic lymph node dissection. In GB cancer, tumor cells can be detected in the biliary juice in the bile duct even though the tumor is localized within the GB.25 In the present case, the patient developed biliary leakages that required multiple suturing repairs during liver parenchymal dissection. Tumor cells in the bile juice might have spread to the retroperitoneal space around the right ureter from the injured bile duct. Therefore, careful attention should be paid to bile leakage resulting not only from a GB injury, but also from a liver parenchymal dissection during extended cholecystectomy.

Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma is a rare primary GB cancer. Nevertheless, 7 of the 13 cases with LMC originating from GB cancer, including the present case, showed signet ring cells and mucinous or poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas (Table 1). In cases of gastric cancer, 94% of the LMC cases were poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas.26 Therefore, poorly differentiated tumor types may be risk factors of LMC originating from GB cancer.

Conclusion

When patients have neurologic symptoms, even after curative resection of GB cancer, the possibility of LMC should be considered. Retroperitoneal metastases and poorly differentiated tumors are possible risk factors of LMC originating from GB cancer.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Clinical Research, Kagoshima University Hospital (approval number: 200177). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's family. Informed consent was obtained from the patient's family for the publication of this report. The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The authors declare that they received no funding support for this study.

References

  • 1. 
    Le Rhun E, Taillibert S, Chamberlain MC. Carcinomatous meningitis: leptomeningeal metastases in solid tumors. Surg Neurol Int2013;4
    (Suppl 4)
    :S265288
  • 2. 
    Beauchesne P. Intrathecal chemotherapy for treatment of leptomeningeal dissemination of metastatic tumours. Lancet Oncol2010;11
    (9)
    :871879
  • 3. 
    Lee JL, Kang YK, Kim TW, Chang HM, Lee GW, Ryu MH et al. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in gastric cancer. J Neurooncol2004;66
    (1-2)
    :167174
  • 4. 
    Kazuhiro N. Frequency and characteristic feature of metastatic brain tumors in Japan. Jpn J Neurosurg2003;12
    (5)
    :323329
  • 5. 
    Naylor AR, MacGregor JE, Hutcheon AW, Best PV. Meningeal carcinomatosis from a clinically undiagnosed signet-ring cell primary in the gallbladder. Surg Neurol1988;29
    (4)
    :315318
  • 6. 
    Honma K, Hamashima H. Fulminating gallbladder cancer presenting as leptomeningeal carcinomatosis and acute renal failure. Wien Klin Wochenschr1990;102
    (21)
    :654656
  • 7. 
    Pedrazzoli P, Merlo P, Da Prada GA, Scelsi M, Gatti C, Martelli A. Late onset of gallbladder carcinoma with meningeal carcinomatosis. Eur J Cancer1992;28a
    (8-9)
    :1589
  • 8. 
    Tans RJ, Koudstaal J, Koehler PJ. Meningeal carcinomatosis as presenting symptom of a gallbladder carcinoma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg1993;95
    (3)
    :253256
  • 9. 
    Gaumann A, Marx J, Bohl J, Kommoss F, Köhler H, Tews DS. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis and cranial nerve palsy as presenting symptoms of a clinically inapparent gallbladder carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract1999;195
    (7)
    :495499
  • 10. 
    Glosová L, Dundr P, Effler J, Růzicková M. Gallbladder carcinoma cells in cerebrospinal fluid as the first manifestation of a tumor. A case report. Acta Cytol2003;47
    (6)
    :10871090
  • 11. 
    Miyagui T, Luchemback L, Teixeira GH, de Azevedo KM. Meningeal carcinomatosis as the initial manifestation of a gallbladder adenocarcinoma associated with a Krukenberg tumor. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo2003;58
    (3)
    :169172
  • 12. 
    Goyal S, Mohanti BK. Leptomeningeal dissemination in gall bladder carcinoma: sequelae of long-term survival? Case Reports Hepatol 2014;2014: 717403
  • 13. 
    Doval DC, Azam S, Sinha R, Batra U, Mehta A, Rao A. A report of two cases of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis arising from gallbladder carcinoma. J Gastrointest Cancer2015;46
    (4)
    :417420
  • 14. 
    Jose N, Perla HT, Iyadurai R, Chacko G. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in a patient with gallbladder carcinoma. J Cytol2017;34
    (2)
    :118121
  • 15. 
    Khan TH, Veer M, Bilal M, Curran-Melendez S, Jani PM, Long GS. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis associated with gall bladder carcinoma: a case report and review of literature. J Gastrointest Cancer2019;50
    (2)
    :315319
  • 16. 
    Mack F, Baumert BG, Schäfer N, Hattingen E, Scheffler B, Herrlinger U et al. Therapy of leptomeningeal metastasis in solid tumors. Cancer Treat Rev2016;43: 8391
  • 17. 
    Nabors LB, Portnow J, Ammirati M, Baehring J, Brem H, Butowski N et al. NCCN guidelines insights: central nervous system cancers, Version 1.2017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw2017;15
    (11)
    :13311345
  • 18. 
    Glass JP, Melamed M, Chernik NL, Posner JB. Malignant cells in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF): the meaning of a positive CSF cytology. Neurology1979;29
    (10)
    :13691375
  • 19. 
    Wasserstrom WR, Glass JP, Posner JB. Diagnosis and treatment of leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: experience with 90 patients. Cancer1982;49
    (4)
    :759772
  • 20. 
    Chamberlain MC, Sandy AD, Press GA. Leptomeningeal metastasis: a comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MR and contrast-enhanced CT of the brain. Neurology1990;40
    (3 Pt 1)
    :435438
  • 21. 
    Ettinger DS, Handorf CR, Agulnik M, Bowles DW, Cates JM, Cristea M et al. Occult primary, version 3.2014. J Natl Compr Canc Netw2014;12
    (7)
    :969974
  • 22. 
    Shapiro WR, Johanson CE, Boogerd W. Treatment modalities for leptomeningeal metastases. Semin Oncol2009;36
    (4 Suppl 2)
    :S4654
  • 23. 
    Grant R, Naylor B, Greenberg HS, Junck L. Clinical outcome in aggressively treated meningeal carcinomatosis. Arch Neurol1994;51
    (5)
    :457461
  • 24. 
    Kokkoris CP. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. How does cancer reach the pia-arachnoid? Cancer1983;51
    (1)
    :154160
  • 25. 
    Itsuki H, Serikawa M, Sasaki T, Ishii Y, Tsushima K, Furukawa Y et al. Indication and usefulness of bile juice cytology for diagnosis of gallbladder cancer. Gastroenterol Res Pract2018;2018: 5410349
  • 26. 
    Oh SY, Lee SJ, Lee J, Lee S, Kim SH, Kwon HC et al. Gastric leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: multi-center retrospective analysis of 54 cases. World J Gastroenterol2009;15
    (40)
    :50865090
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Histopathologic findings. (a) A flat-infiltrating tumor covered with papillary expansions is shown. (b) Cancer cells are shown invading the subserosal layer (hematoxylin and eosin, ×40). (c) Components of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma are shown (hematoxylin and eosin, ×200). (d) Components of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma are visible (hematoxylin and eosin, ×200).


Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Imaging findings. (a, b) Computed tomography shows hydronephrosis in the right kidney (arrow in a) and ureteral thickening (arrow in b). (c) Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain shows hyperintense areas of lesions along the cerebral sulcus (arrows).


Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Cytologic findings. Cytology of cerebrospinal fluid shows adenocarcinoma cells (Papanicolaou ×400).


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author: Masashi Okawa, Cardiovascular and Gastroenterological Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima City, 890-8520, Japan. Tel.:+81-99-275-5368; Fax:+81-99-265-8177; E-mail: k1445531@kadai.jp
  • Download PDF