Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Jan 2019

Adult Gastric Bronchogenic Cyst With Elevated Tumor Marker in Containing Fluid: A Case Report and Literature Review

,
,
,
,
,
, and
Page Range: 58 – 64
DOI: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-16-00025.1
Save
Download PDF

Introduction:

Duplication cysts are rare malformations that exist in the alimentary tract, and the mucosa of gastric bronchogenic cyst lined by pseudostratified columnar ciliated epithelium (PCCE) is even more rare. We reviewed related literatures to depict this unique abnormality.

Case presentation:

Herein we report an abdominal mass that was found incidentally in a 52-year-old female. The biochemical test of contents revealed a high concentration of tumor markers unusually. A laparoscopic surgery was undertaken to remove the lesion. The cyst was found to originate from the stomach but did not show any anatomic communication with the stomach lumen. Pathologic examination confirmed the mucosa was lined by PCCE.

Conclusion:

The symptoms and radiologic presentations of GDC are nonspecific. It should be distinguished with other abdominal cystic masses. Surgery is advised in respective of malignancy.

Gastrointestinal duplication cysts are uncommon malformations in the gastrointestinal tract with an uncertain location anywhere from the esophagus to the colon. Gastric duplication cyst (GDC) accounts for about 2% to 8% of all gastrointestinal duplication cysts.1 More than half of the patients were accurately diagnosed in early childhood, as a result of unspecific symptoms associated with GDC in children.24 Conversely, most adult patients are asymptomatic and cysts are often found incidentally.5 The requisite criteria for diagnosing of GDC is: (a) the wall of the cyst is contiguous with the stomach wall; (b) the cyst is surrounded by smooth muscle, which is continuous with the muscle of the stomach; and (c) the cyst wall is lined by epithelium of gastric or any other type of gut mucosa.6,7

In this paper, we presented a case of GDC lined by pseudostratified columnar ciliated epithelium (PCCE), with extremely high concentrations of CEA, CA19-9, and CA-125 in the content fluid. All available relevant literature was collected and analyzed comprehensively.

Case Report

A 52-year-old female admitted into our hospital for further consultation after an abdominal mass was detected.

No symptoms were presented. Her weight did not drop sharply. She admitted a history of pulmonary tuberculosis for 3 years. Apart from this, further history did not reveal any other chronic diseases. Examination was unspecific. Liver function test and tumor marker test were within normal ranges.

The ultrasound test indicated a hypoechoic lesion located in the less curvature of the stomach. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen and pelvis showed an oval thick-walled collection posterior to the gastric wall and anterior to the pancreatic body without any contrast enhancement (Fig. 1). The cyst size was about 63 × 37 mm. An ulcer could be seen in the gastric mucosa, but no cyst or communication between the cyst and stomach lumen was found under gastroscopy endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS; Fig. 2). EUS was introduced, and the results showed part of the cyst wall maybe connected to the pancreas. Drainage of the cyst was done with a needle under EUS; a coffee-colored mucoid fluid of about 11 mL was drained. The biochemical examination of the fluid showed ascending amylase (3815U/L) and notable elevated levels of CEA (13,550 ng/mL), CA19-9 (40742U/mL), CA-125 (>10,000U/mL), CA15-3 (262.5U/mL), ferritin (1928.5ng/mL) separately, while AFP was undetectable. A diagnosis of pancreatic mucinous cystadenoma was established.

Fig. 1 . CT of this patient showed the cyst clearly. (a) Non-contrast enhanced CT revealed a thick-walled cyst (red box) posterior to the gastric wall. (b) The cyst did not show contrast enhancement in arterial phase of contrast enhanced CT.Fig. 1 . CT of this patient showed the cyst clearly. (a) Non-contrast enhanced CT revealed a thick-walled cyst (red box) posterior to the gastric wall. (b) The cyst did not show contrast enhancement in arterial phase of contrast enhanced CT.Fig. 1 . CT of this patient showed the cyst clearly. (a) Non-contrast enhanced CT revealed a thick-walled cyst (red box) posterior to the gastric wall. (b) The cyst did not show contrast enhancement in arterial phase of contrast enhanced CT.
Fig. 1 CT of this patient showed the cyst clearly. (a) Non-contrast enhanced CT revealed a thick-walled cyst (red box) posterior to the gastric wall. (b) The cyst did not show contrast enhancement in arterial phase of contrast enhanced CT.

Citation: International Surgery 104, 1-2; 10.9738/INTSURG-D-16-00025.1

Fig. 2 . EUS showed nonatrophic gastritis without erosion. (a) The cyst did not communicate with gastric cavity. (b) The size of cyst's cross section (red asterisk) was 6.6 × 3.0 cm.Fig. 2 . EUS showed nonatrophic gastritis without erosion. (a) The cyst did not communicate with gastric cavity. (b) The size of cyst's cross section (red asterisk) was 6.6 × 3.0 cm.Fig. 2 . EUS showed nonatrophic gastritis without erosion. (a) The cyst did not communicate with gastric cavity. (b) The size of cyst's cross section (red asterisk) was 6.6 × 3.0 cm.
Fig. 2 EUS showed nonatrophic gastritis without erosion. (a) The cyst did not communicate with gastric cavity. (b) The size of cyst's cross section (red asterisk) was 6.6 × 3.0 cm.

Citation: International Surgery 104, 1-2; 10.9738/INTSURG-D-16-00025.1

A laparoscopic laparotomy was performed and found the cyst was surprisingly isolated from the pancreas and diaphragm legs, but originated from the posterior wall of the less curvature of the stomach (Fig. 3). The cystic lesion was resected with a stapling cutter from the stomach wall. Gross check on-table revealed normal gastric mucosa of the medial surface of the specimen (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3 . Findings from the perspective of laparoscope.Fig. 3 . Findings from the perspective of laparoscope.Fig. 3 . Findings from the perspective of laparoscope.
Fig. 3 Findings from the perspective of laparoscope.

Citation: International Surgery 104, 1-2; 10.9738/INTSURG-D-16-00025.1

Fig. 4 . The inner wall of the cyst looks demonstrated normal gastric mucosa on the whole.Fig. 4 . The inner wall of the cyst looks demonstrated normal gastric mucosa on the whole.Fig. 4 . The inner wall of the cyst looks demonstrated normal gastric mucosa on the whole.
Fig. 4 The inner wall of the cyst looks demonstrated normal gastric mucosa on the whole.

Citation: International Surgery 104, 1-2; 10.9738/INTSURG-D-16-00025.1

The pathologic examination confirmed that the cyst was embedded within the gastric muscular layer and did not communicate with the gastric lumen. Microscopically, the cyst wall was lined with PCCE. The smooth muscle layers underneath the mucosa were consecutive and intact (Fig. 5). Ultimately, the diagnosis was determined as gastric bronchogenic cyst.

Fig. 5 . Histopathologic examination revealed the specific characteristic of the mucosa. (a, b) Hematoxylin-eosin stained histologic section showed cyst wall lined by PCCE. (c, d) The smooth muscle layers underneath the mucosa were consecutive and intact. Original magnifications were ×100 high field (a, c) and ×400 high field (b, d) separately.Fig. 5 . Histopathologic examination revealed the specific characteristic of the mucosa. (a, b) Hematoxylin-eosin stained histologic section showed cyst wall lined by PCCE. (c, d) The smooth muscle layers underneath the mucosa were consecutive and intact. Original magnifications were ×100 high field (a, c) and ×400 high field (b, d) separately.Fig. 5 . Histopathologic examination revealed the specific characteristic of the mucosa. (a, b) Hematoxylin-eosin stained histologic section showed cyst wall lined by PCCE. (c, d) The smooth muscle layers underneath the mucosa were consecutive and intact. Original magnifications were ×100 high field (a, c) and ×400 high field (b, d) separately.
Fig. 5 Histopathologic examination revealed the specific characteristic of the mucosa. (a, b) Hematoxylin-eosin stained histologic section showed cyst wall lined by PCCE. (c, d) The smooth muscle layers underneath the mucosa were consecutive and intact. Original magnifications were ×100 high field (a, c) and ×400 high field (b, d) separately.

Citation: International Surgery 104, 1-2; 10.9738/INTSURG-D-16-00025.1

The patient was uneventful recovered and was discharged on postoperative day 5. A 1-year follow-up showed the patient was well and free of tumor recurrence.

Discussion

Duplication cyst is a broad definition, irrespective of its location, morphology, or pathology, by way of simplifying the nomenclature.8 This means alimentary duplication cysts are abnormalities of different size with the possibility of arising from anywhere along the gastrointestinal tract. The symptoms can be variable, including vomiting, anemia, nausea, distension, dysphagia, and dyspepsia.5 Most of them are discovered incidentally during routine physical examination.

Aberrant tissues such as pancreas and respiratory epithelium were confirmed with pathologic examination in some duplication cysts.911 PCCE is typical tissue which exists in respiratory mucosa. To elucidate the outline of this special malformation, we reviewed all reported cases of GDCs lined by PCCE, presented in Table 1.1131 Patients were confirmed with a cystic mass in adult ages, without difference in prevalence in males and females. Most patients presented as asymptomatic. No patient was found in a condition which the cyst communicated with the gastric lumen. Accurate diagnoses were quite few, yet replaced with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), neurogenic tumor, adenocarcinoma, or other abdominal diseases.

Table 1 Reported gastric duplication cysts lined by PCCE

          Table 1

Adenocarcinoma arising from GDCs lined by PCCE was not always found in reports, but there are still debates about GDC malignant transformations.3236 The author related it to the lasting action of chronic inflammation in duplication cysts. Fukumoto33 insists that it is a red alert for those who are identified with GDCs and older than 50, because of continuous exposure to carcinogenic substances. In the case we presented, the fluid drained from the cyst contained extremely high levels of CEA, CA19-9, and CA-125, which questioned the meaning of this phenomenon. Only 2 other articles have pointed out similar findings, but neither of both were the same pathologic characteristics.37,38 Tumor markers are referred as cancer biomarkers. They are produced by tumors or by the bodies in response to cancer. Different elevated levels of CEA, CA19-9 and CA-125 often arose in patients who suffer from pancreas cancer, colon cancer, etc.39 Combined with previous studies, we have reasons to believe that the elevated tumor marker indicated a potential risk of malignancy, regardless of its leading role or possibly just a byproduct in this process.

Interestingly, expression of TTF-1, MUC1, MUC5AC, and surfactant were confirmed in different cases.40 TTF-1 and surfactant participate in lung embryogenesis and maturation. With the ciliated epithelium, the authors assumed a branch arising from the respiratory diverticulum gives rise to the development of gastric bronchogenic cyst. The expression of TTF-1 begins at weeks 11-12 gestation in fetus, hence it is possible that the expression of TTF-1 is negative if a duplication cyst developed at a very early stage during gestation.29

Duplications presented in spherical or tubular forms mostly. The former is much more common, accounting for about 82% of all reported cases and separate with the gastrointestinal lumen. Tubular cysts are usually seen in the bowel, communicating with the lumen.41 Atypical dumbbell-shaped cells have been found in some cases.42 Gastric duplication cysts are frequently located in the greater curvature of stomach, adjacent to the pancreas, spleen, or other abdominal organs.

Different imaging examinations display duplication cysts well. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed a thick-walled cystic lesion with enhancement of the inner lining.43,44 Calcified plaque emerges occasionally. Solid foci may suggest tumor formation in the cyst. Septa in the cyst may suggest infection. CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remain superior in diagnosing GDC because of its ability to show cyst margins clearly. However, the advantage of MRI over CT is its ability to make a clear distinction between the thin walls separating the cysts and other organs on T2-weighted images.45 This also provides more information about mucous or serous contents in the cysts. The fluid content of cysts are diverse due insults such as bleeding, infection, or inflammation.

EUS also provides more details about GDC compared to ordinary ultrasound. Meanwhile, it can aid in the pathologic examination and even treatment. Eom et al 46 used this technique to operate a complete dissection of GDC. GDCs should be considered when ultrasound examination reveals an echogenic internal mucosal layer and a hypoechoic intermediate muscular layer, defined as “double wall” or “muscular rim.”47 Nevertheless, these instruments are not sufficient to identify duplication cysts accurately, due to the nonspecific features of these cysts. GDC can be misdiagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumor, pancreatic cyst, splenic cyst, etc. It is notable that neoplasms from GDCs should be distinguished from those associated with cystic neoplasms or tumors with cystic degeneration, such as a GIST, neuroendocrine tumor, neurogenic tumor, or heterotopic pancreas.9,48,49

Some authors recommended conservative therapy in asymptomatic patients.47 However, given the unknown risk of malignant transformation, surgery is by far considered as the primary suggested treatment. Laparoscopic surgery is quite safe as it ensures an en bloc excision and minimize invasive injury for patients. If a complete excision is not achievable, a partial gastrectomy can be considered as an alternative method.

Acknowledgments

Support of grants: National Natural Science Foundation of China (CN) (81372626).

References

  • 1
    Fox RT,
    Fowler JT Jr.
    Duplication of the alimentary tract. J Pediatr1952; 41(
    2
    ): 194197
  • 2
    Rowling JT.
    Some observations on gastric cysts. Br J Surg1959; 46(
    199
    ): 441445
  • 3
    Wieczorek RL,
    Seidman I,
    Ranson JH,
    Ruoff M.
    Congenital duplication of the stomach: case report and review of the English literature. Am J Gastroenterol1984; 79(
    8
    ): 597602
  • 4
    Perek A,
    Perek S,
    Kapan M,
    Goksoy E.
    Gastric duplication cyst. Dig Surg2000; 17(
    6
    ): 634646
  • 5
    Singh JP,
    Rajdeo H,
    Bhuta K,
    Savino JA.
    Gastric duplication cyst: two case reports and review of the literature. Case Rep Surg2013; 2013: 605059
  • 6
    Shireman PK.
    Intramural cyst of the stomach. Hum Pathol1987; 18(
    8
    ): 857858
  • 7
    Tanenbaum B,
    Levowitz BS,
    Ponce M,
    Manubay S Jr.
    Respiratory choristoma of stomach. N Y State J Med. 1971; 71(
    3
    ): 373375
  • 8
    Cavalcanti JS,
    Menezes H.
    Bronchogenic cyst of the mediastinum [in Portuguese]. Rev Bras Med1951; 8(
    5
    ): 328331
  • 9
    Sinha A,
    Saluja SS,
    Gamanagatti S.
    Gastric duplication cyst with macroscopic serosal heterotopic pancreas. JOP2010; 11(
    5
    ): 470473
  • 10
    Rubio CA,
    Orrego A,
    Willen R.
    Bronchogenic gastric cyst. A case report. In vivo2005; 19(
    2
    ): 383385
  • 11
    Falleti J,
    Vigliar E,
    Zeppa P,
    Schettino P,
    Napolitano V,
    D'Armiento M.
    Gastric duplication cyst: a rare congenital disease often misdiagnosed in adults. Case Rep Gastrointest Med2013; 2013: 850967
  • 12
    Belli S,
    Noyan T,
    Kayaselçuk F,
    Erbay G.
    Gastric duplication (bronchogenic) cyst mimicking a gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Ulus Cerrahi Derg2013; 29(
    1
    ): 3537
  • 13
    Jiang W,
    Zhang B,
    Fu YB,
    Wang JW,
    Gao SL,
    Zhang SZ
    et al.
    Gastric duplication cyst lined by pseudostratified columnar ciliated epithelium: a case report and literature review. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B2011; 12(
    1
    ): 2831
  • 14
    Jiang L,
    Jiang L,
    Cheng N,
    Yan L.
    Bronchogenic cyst of the gastric fundus in a young woman. Dig Liver Dis2010; 42(
    11
    ): 826
  • 15
    Mardi K,
    Kaushal V,
    Gupta S.
    Foregut duplication cysts of stomach masquerading as leiomyoma. Indian J Pathol Microbiol2010; 53(
    4
    ): 829830
  • 16
    Sato M,
    Irisawa A,
    Bhutani MS,
    Schnadig V,
    Takagi T,
    Shibukawa G
    et al.
    Gastric bronchogenic cyst diagnosed by endosonographically guided fine needle aspiration biopsy. J Clin Ultrasound2008; 36(
    4
    ): 237239
  • 17
    Murakami S,
    Isozaki H,
    Shou T,
    Sakai K,
    Toyota H.
    Foregut duplication cyst of the stomach with pseudostratified columnar ciliated epithelium. Pathol Int2008; 58(
    3
    ): 187190
  • 18
    Wakabayashi H,
    Okano K,
    Yamamoto N,
    Suzuki Y,
    Inoue H,
    Kadota K
    et al.
    Laparoscopically resected foregut duplication cyst (bronchogenic) of the stomach. Dig Dis Sci2007; 52(
    8
    ): 17671770
  • 19
    Theodosopoulos T,
    Marinis A,
    Karapanos K,
    Vassilikostas G,
    Dafnios N,
    Samanides L
    et al.
    Foregut duplication cysts of the stomach with respiratory epithelium. World J Gastroenterol2007; 13(
    8
    ): 12791281
  • 20
    Hall DA,
    Pu RT,
    Pang Y.
    Diagnosis of foregut and tailgut cysts by endosonographically guided fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol2007; 35(
    1
    ): 4346
  • 21
    Lee SH,
    Park DH,
    Park JH,
    Kim HS,
    Park SH,
    Kim SJ
    et al.
    Endoscopic mucosal resection of a gastric bronchogenic cyst that was mimicking a solid tumor. Endoscopy2006; 38
    Suppl 2
    : E12E3
  • 22
    Melo N,
    Pitman MB,
    Rattner DW.
    Bronchogenic cyst of the gastric fundus presenting as a gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A2005; 15(
    2
    ): 163165
  • 23
    Cunningham SC,
    Hansel DE,
    Fishman EK,
    Cameron JL.
    Foregut duplication cyst of the stomach. J Gastrointest Surg2006; 10(
    4
    ): 620621
  • 24
    Rubio CA,
    Orrego A,
    Willen R.
    Congenital bronchogenic cyst in the gastric mucosa. J Clin Pathol2005; 58(
    3
    ): 335
  • 25
    Song SY,
    Noh JH,
    Lee SJ,
    Son HJ.
    Bronchogenic cyst of the stomach masquerading as benign stromal tumor. Pathol Int2005; 55(
    2
    ): 8791
  • 26
    Hedayati N,
    Cai DX,
    McHenry CR.
    Subdiaphragmatic bronchogenic cyst masquerading as an “adrenal incidentaloma”. J Gastrointest Surg2003; 7(
    6
    ): 802804
  • 27
    Kim DH,
    Kim JS,
    Nam ES,
    Shin HS.
    Foregut duplication cyst of the stomach. Pathol Int2000; 50(
    2
    ): 142145
  • 28
    Takahara T,
    Torigoe T,
    Haga H,
    Yoshida H,
    Takeshima S,
    Sano S
    et al.
    Gastric duplication cyst: evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Gastroenterol1996; 31(
    3
    ): 420424
  • 29
    Kurokawa T,
    Yamamoto M,
    Ueda T,
    Enomoto T,
    Inoue K,
    Uchida A
    et al.
    Gastric bronchogenic cyst histologically diagnosed after laparoscopic excision: report of a case. Int Surg2013; 98(
    4
    ): 455460
  • 30
    Gensler S,
    Seidenberg B,
    Rifkin H,
    Rubinstein BM.
    Ciliated lined intramural cyst of the stomach: case report and suggested embryogenesis. Ann Surg1966; 163(
    6
    ): 954956
  • 31
    Shibahara H,
    Arai T,
    Yokoi S,
    Hayakawa S.
    Bronchogenic cyst of the stomach involved with gastricadenocarcinoma. Clin J Gastroenterol2009; 2(
    2
    ): 8084
  • 32
    Coit DG,
    Mies C.
    Adenocarcinoma arising within a gastric duplication cyst. J Surg Oncol1992; 50(
    4
    ): 274277
  • 33
    Fukumoto K,
    Suzuki S,
    Sakaguchi T,
    Morita Y,
    Oishi K,
    Suzuki A
    et al.
    Adenocarcinoma arising from gastric duplication: a case report with literature review. Clin J Gastroenterol2008; 1(
    4
    ): 148152
  • 34
    Kang HJ,
    Jang SJ,
    Park YS.
    Adenocarcinoma arising in gastric duplication cyst. Korean J Pathol2014; 48(
    2
    ): 159161
  • 35
    Kuraoka K,
    Nakayama H,
    Kagawa T,
    Ichikawa T,
    Yasui W.
    Adenocarcinoma arising from a gastric duplication cyst with invasion to the stomach: a case report with literature review. J Clin Pathol2004; 57(
    4
    ): 428431.
  • 36
    Zheng J,
    Jing H.
    Adenocarcinoma arising from a gastric duplication cyst. Surg Oncol2012; 21(
    2
    ): e97e101
  • 37
    D'Journo XB,
    Moutardier V,
    Turrini O,
    Guiramand J,
    Lelong B,
    Pesenti C
    et al.
    Gastric duplication in an adult mimicking mucinous cystadenoma of the pancreas. J Clin Pathol2004; 57(
    11
    ): 12151218
  • 38
    Ikehata A,
    Sakuma T.
    Gastric duplication cyst with markedly elevated concentration of carbohydrate antigen 19-9. Am J Gastroenterol2000; 95(
    3
    ): 842843
  • 39
    Manne U,
    Srivastava RG,
    Srivastava S.
    Recent advances in biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and treatment. Drug Discov Today2005; 10(
    14
    ): 965976
  • 40
    Khoury T,
    Rivera L.
    Foregut duplication cysts: a report of two cases with emphasis on embryogenesis. World J Gastroenterol2011; 17(
    1
    ): 130134
  • 41
    Upadhyaya VD,
    Srivastava PK,
    Jaiman R,
    Gangopadhyay AN,
    Gupta DK,
    Sharma SP.
    Duplication cyst of pyloroduodenal canal: a rare cause of neonatal gastric outlet obstruction: a case report. Cases J2009; 2(
    1
    ): 42
  • 42
    Krishna Kumar G.
    Gastric duplication cyst in an infant presenting with non-bilious vomiting. Malays J Med Sci2012; 19(
    1
    ): 768
  • 43
    Ferrari AP Jr,
    Van Dam J,
    Carr-Locke DL.
    Endoscopic needle aspiration of a gastric duplication cyst. Endoscopy1995; 27(
    3
    ): 270372
  • 44
    Macpherson RI.
    Gastrointestinal tract duplications: clinical, pathologic, etiologic, and radiologic considerations. Radiographics1993; 13(
    5
    ): 10631080
  • 45
    Surridge CA,
    Goodier MD.
    Gastric duplication cyst: A cause of rectal bleeding in a young child. Afr J Paediatr Surg2014; 11(
    3
    ): 267268
  • 46
    Eom JS,
    Kim GH,
    Song GA,
    Baek DH,
    Ryu KD,
    Lee KN
    et al.
    Gastric duplication cyst removed by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Korean J Gastroenterol2011; 58(
    6
    ): 346369
  • 47
    Eloubeidi MA,
    Cohn M,
    Cerfolio RJ,
    Chhieng DC,
    Jhala N,
    Jhala D
    et al.
    Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of foregut duplication cysts: the value of demonstrating detached ciliary tufts in cyst fluid. Cancer2004; 102(
    4
    ): 253258
  • 48
    Min SH,
    Kim HY,
    Kim SH,
    Jung SE,
    Park KW,
    Kim WS
    et al.
    Gastric adenomyoma mimicking gastric duplication cyst in a 5-year-old girl. J Pediatr Surg2012; 47(
    5
    ): 10191022
  • 49
    Maeda H,
    Okabayashi T,
    Nishimori I,
    Kobayashi M,
    Morimoto K,
    Miyaji E
    et al.
    Diagnostic challenge to distinguish gastric duplication cyst from pancreatic cystic lesions in adult. Intern Med2007; 46(
    14
    ): 11011104
<bold>Fig. 1</bold>
Fig. 1

CT of this patient showed the cyst clearly. (a) Non-contrast enhanced CT revealed a thick-walled cyst (red box) posterior to the gastric wall. (b) The cyst did not show contrast enhancement in arterial phase of contrast enhanced CT.


<bold>Fig. 2</bold>
Fig. 2

EUS showed nonatrophic gastritis without erosion. (a) The cyst did not communicate with gastric cavity. (b) The size of cyst's cross section (red asterisk) was 6.6 × 3.0 cm.


<bold>Fig. 3</bold>
Fig. 3

Findings from the perspective of laparoscope.


<bold>Fig. 4</bold>
Fig. 4

The inner wall of the cyst looks demonstrated normal gastric mucosa on the whole.


<bold>Fig. 5</bold>
Fig. 5

Histopathologic examination revealed the specific characteristic of the mucosa. (a, b) Hematoxylin-eosin stained histologic section showed cyst wall lined by PCCE. (c, d) The smooth muscle layers underneath the mucosa were consecutive and intact. Original magnifications were ×100 high field (a, c) and ×400 high field (b, d) separately.


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author: Shusen Zheng, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, No. 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province P.R. China., Email: shusenzheng@zju.edu.cn
  • Download PDF