Editorial Type:
Article Category: Other
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Apr 2015

Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma With Lymphoepithelioma-like Carcinoma Components Not Associated With Epstein-Barr Virus: Report of a Case

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
Page Range: 689 – 695
DOI: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00117.1
Save
Download PDF

A carcinoma displaying undifferentiated features with dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltration is defined as lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (LELC). Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) with LELC components is rare, and most LELCs are associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). We report here on a case of ICC with LELC components not associated with EBV. A 65-year-old woman was incidentally found to have a hepatic tumor in the caudate lobe. An extended right hepatectomy with lymphadenectomy was performed. Histologically, the tumor was mainly composed of large undifferentiated epithelial cells with vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, indistinct cell borders, and heavy small lymphocytic infiltration, which are the characteristic features of LELC. Immunohistochemical studies revealed that the tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin 19 but were negative for glypican 3. In situ hybridization using EBV-encoded RNA was negative. Therefore, a diagnosis of ICC with LELC components not associated with EBV was made. Because there is limited information available regarding the prognosis and treatment of ICC with LELC components because of the limited number of reported cases, additional studies will be needed to clarify the clinicopathologic features of this disease.

Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinomas (LELCs) are tumors that are composed of undifferentiated carcinoma with an intense lymphocytic infiltrate, and they have histomorphologic features identical to those of undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinomas. These tumors have been reported in various anatomic sites, such as the stomach, salivary gland, and thymus.1 The occurrence of LELC in the hepatobiliary tract is rare. Most LELCs have been reported to be associated with the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV).14 To the best of our knowledge, only 6 cases of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) with LELC components not associated with EBV infection have been reported,510 and only 2 cases with lymph node metastases at the time of surgery have been reported.5,9 In this paper, we report on an unusual case of an ICC with LELC components accompanied by lymph node metastases not associated with EBV infection.

Case Report

A 65-year-old woman was incidentally found to have a hepatic tumor by abdominal ultrasonography at a local hospital. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed a heterogeneous liver tumor measuring 5 cm in diameter in the caudate lobe adjacent to the right portal branch and the inferior vena cava. CT revealed a low-attenuation mass measuring 5 cm in diameter in the right hepatic anterior lobe and caudate lobe adjacent to the right portal branch and the inferior vena cava. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT showed a slightly enhanced mass in the arterial phase, which washed out in the portal and delayed phases (Fig. 1). Magnetic resonance imaging showed that the hepatic mass appeared to be hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on both T2-weighted images and diffusion-weighted images (Fig. 2). The laboratory findings were as follows: hematocrit, 36.0%; platelets, 208 × 103/μL; aspartate aminotransferase, 25 U/L (normal <35 U/L); alanine aminotransferase, 20 U (normal <28 U); bilirubin, 0.4 mg/dL (normal <1.0 mg/dL); albumin, 4.4 g/dL; and prothrombin time, 88.9%. The indocyanine green retention rate after 15 minutes was 7.1%. The findings for the serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen were negative, whereas the patient tested positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies. Her serum carcinoembryonic antigen level was elevated, at 10.7 ng/mL (normal <5 ng/mL), but the levels of other tumor markers, including alpha-fetoprotein (6.0 ng/mL; normal <10 mg/mL), des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (PIVKA-II; 31 mAU/mL; normal <40 mAU/mL), and CA19-9 (11.3 U/mL; normal <37 U/mL), were within the normal ranges. An extended right hepatectomy was performed, and enlarged lymph nodes that were noted in the porta hepatica were removed. The length of the operation was 7 hours and 25 minutes, and the total amount of blood loss was 499 mL.

Fig. 1. CT images. (A) CT revealed a low-attenuation mass in the right hepatic anterior lobe and caudate lobe in the simple phase. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT showed a slightly enhanced mass (B) in the arterial phase, which washed out in the (C) portal phase and in the (D) delayed phase.Fig. 1. CT images. (A) CT revealed a low-attenuation mass in the right hepatic anterior lobe and caudate lobe in the simple phase. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT showed a slightly enhanced mass (B) in the arterial phase, which washed out in the (C) portal phase and in the (D) delayed phase.Fig. 1. CT images. (A) CT revealed a low-attenuation mass in the right hepatic anterior lobe and caudate lobe in the simple phase. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT showed a slightly enhanced mass (B) in the arterial phase, which washed out in the (C) portal phase and in the (D) delayed phase.
Fig. 1 CT images. (A) CT revealed a low-attenuation mass in the right hepatic anterior lobe and caudate lobe in the simple phase. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT showed a slightly enhanced mass (B) in the arterial phase, which washed out in the (C) portal phase and in the (D) delayed phase.

Citation: International Surgery 100, 4; 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00117.1

Fig. 2. Magnetic resonance imaging showed that the hepatic mass appeared to be hypointense (A) on T1-weighted image and hyperintense on both (B) T2-weighted image and (C) diffusion-weighted image.Fig. 2. Magnetic resonance imaging showed that the hepatic mass appeared to be hypointense (A) on T1-weighted image and hyperintense on both (B) T2-weighted image and (C) diffusion-weighted image.Fig. 2. Magnetic resonance imaging showed that the hepatic mass appeared to be hypointense (A) on T1-weighted image and hyperintense on both (B) T2-weighted image and (C) diffusion-weighted image.
Fig. 2 Magnetic resonance imaging showed that the hepatic mass appeared to be hypointense (A) on T1-weighted image and hyperintense on both (B) T2-weighted image and (C) diffusion-weighted image.

Citation: International Surgery 100, 4; 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00117.1

A 14.7 × 14.3 × 8.0 cm segment of the liver weighing 660 g, and the enlarged lymph nodes in the porta hepatica were resected. Macroscopically, there was a 6.4 × 4.9 × 4.7 cm circumscribed, round, yellowish white, soft tumor found in the resected segment (Fig. 3). The background liver was not cirrhotic. Microscopically, the neoplasm was mainly composed of large undifferentiated epithelial cells with vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, indistinct cell borders, and heavy small lymphocytic infiltration, which are characteristic features of LELC. No carcinoma cells invaded the bile duct, and the surgical margin was free. Alcian blue staining was positive in the epithelial lining. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin 19, but they were negative for glypican 3 (Fig. 4). In situ hybridization using EBV-encoded RNA was negative. Based on these analyses of the resected liver mass, the patient was diagnosed with ICC with LELC components not associated with EBV. A total of 2 of the 10 resected lymph nodes revealed metastasis, which exclusively consisted of LELC components.

Fig. 3. Macroscopic findings of the resected specimen. Image shows circumscribed, round, yellowish white, soft tumor.Fig. 3. Macroscopic findings of the resected specimen. Image shows circumscribed, round, yellowish white, soft tumor.Fig. 3. Macroscopic findings of the resected specimen. Image shows circumscribed, round, yellowish white, soft tumor.
Fig. 3 Macroscopic findings of the resected specimen. Image shows circumscribed, round, yellowish white, soft tumor.

Citation: International Surgery 100, 4; 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00117.1

Fig. 4. Histologic specimen of liver tumor. (A) The neoplasm was mainly composed of large undifferentiated epithelial cells with vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, indistinct cell borders, and heavy small lymphocytic infiltration. (B) Alcian blue staining was positive in epithelial lining. (C) Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated positivity for cytokeratin 19. (D) Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated negativity for glypican 3.Fig. 4. Histologic specimen of liver tumor. (A) The neoplasm was mainly composed of large undifferentiated epithelial cells with vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, indistinct cell borders, and heavy small lymphocytic infiltration. (B) Alcian blue staining was positive in epithelial lining. (C) Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated positivity for cytokeratin 19. (D) Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated negativity for glypican 3.Fig. 4. Histologic specimen of liver tumor. (A) The neoplasm was mainly composed of large undifferentiated epithelial cells with vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, indistinct cell borders, and heavy small lymphocytic infiltration. (B) Alcian blue staining was positive in epithelial lining. (C) Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated positivity for cytokeratin 19. (D) Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated negativity for glypican 3.
Fig. 4 Histologic specimen of liver tumor. (A) The neoplasm was mainly composed of large undifferentiated epithelial cells with vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, indistinct cell borders, and heavy small lymphocytic infiltration. (B) Alcian blue staining was positive in epithelial lining. (C) Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated positivity for cytokeratin 19. (D) Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated negativity for glypican 3.

Citation: International Surgery 100, 4; 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00117.1

The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient has been free from tumor recurrence for 20 months since the surgery.

Discussion

Neoplasms with features of undifferentiated carcinoma with intense lymphoid stroma are classified as LELCs, and it has been reported that LELCs can occur in various organs, including the salivary gland,11 thymus,12 trachea,13 lung,14 esophagus,15 stomach,16 urinary bladder,17 uterine cervix,18 and vagina.19 To the best of our knowledge, 8 cases of lymphoepithelioma-like hepatocellular carcinoma,2023 1 case of LELC of the inferior common bile duct,24 and 16 cases of ICC with LELC component have been reported in the English literature.210,2527 In this case, the tumor cells showed positive immunoreactivity for cytokeratin 19 but no immunoreactivity for glypican 3, a useful marker of hepatocellular carcinoma. This immunohistochemical phenotype was considered to be an indicator for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma. A summary of the previously reported cases of ICC with LELC components is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 A summary of clinicopathologic features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma components
Table 1

Like nasopharyngeal carcinomas, most LELCs are strongly associated with EBV,1 as are LELCs of the salivary gland,11 thymus,12 lung,14 and stomach.16 In contrast, EBV was not associated with LELCs observed in the oral cavity,28 urinary bladder,17 uterine cervix,29 and vagina.19 In lymphoepithelioma-like hepatocellular carcinoma, 87% (7 of 8) of cases were EBV negative,20,21,23 and 1 case of LELC of the inferior common bile duct was also EBV negative.24 On the other hand, in ICC with LELC components, 38% (6 of 16) of cases were EBV negative. These results suggest that the involvement of EBV genome integration in LELC depends on the origin of the LELC. Furthermore, Adachi et al7 reported that there are no obvious histopathologic differences between EBV-positive and EBV-negative ICC with LELC components. Therefore, the role of EBV in the tumorigenesis of LELC remains poorly understood and controversial, and lymphoepithelioma-like morphologic changes in cholangiocarcinoma can occur in both the presence and absence of EBV genome integration.

The present case was HCV positive, and several previous studies30,31 have reported that HCV infection plays an etiologic role in ICC; Lee et al32 indicated that there is a close relationship between the development of ICC and HBV infection. However, previous reports showed that only 31% (5 of 16) of patients were HBV positive and 13% (2 of 16) of patients were HCV positive. These findings suggest that the roles of HBV and HCV in the pathogenesis of ICC with LELC components are unclear and the further accumulation of studies is needed.

It has been reported that LELC of the stomach and lung has a better prognosis than other neoplasms of these sites.33,34 Similarly, the prognosis of ICC with LELC components seems to be better than that of the conventional type of cholangiocarcinoma.8,25,35 There is no consensus on a standardized treatment strategy for LELC. In the previously reported cases, the patients all underwent surgical resection of their tumors. Lee5 reported that a case with metastasis to a para-aortic lymph node at the time of surgery underwent postoperative radiation and was still alive without recurrence 54 months after the surgery. The present patient also had lymph node metastases, but the metastatic lymph nodes were resected completely at the time of surgery, and the patient is alive without recurrence 20 months after the surgery. Cases of ICC with LELC components accompanied by lymph node metastases are extremely rare. Because there is limited information available regarding the prognosis and treatment of ICC with LELC components because of the limited number of reported cases, additional studies will be needed to clarify the clinicopathologic features of this disease.

References

  • 1
    Iezzoni JC,
    Gaffey MJ,
    Weiss LM.
    The role of Epstein-Barr virus in lymphoepithelioma-like carcinomas. Am J Clin Pathol1995;103(
    3
    ):308315
  • 2
    Henderson-Jackson E,
    Nasir NA,
    Hakam A,
    Nasir A,
    Coppola D.
    Primary mixed lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma and intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a case report and review of literature. Int J Clin Exp Pathol2010;3(
    7
    ):736741
  • 3
    Huang Y,
    Tsung JS,
    Lin CW,
    Cheng TY.
    Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma component. Ann Clin Lab Sci2004;34(
    4
    ):476480
  • 4
    Ortiz MR,
    Garijo G,
    Adrados M,
    Lopez-Bonet E,
    Acero D,
    Bernado L.
    Epstein-Barr virus-associated cholangiocarcinoma with lymphoepithelioma-like component. Int J Surg Pathol2000;8(
    4
    ):347351
  • 5
    Lee W.
    Intrahepatic lymphoepithelioma-like cholangiocarcinoma not associated with epstein-barr virus: a case report. Case Rep Oncol2011;4(
    1
    ):6873
  • 6
    Hur YH,
    Kim HH,
    Koh YS,
    Seoung JS,
    Cho CK.
    Lymphoepithelioma-like cholangiocarcinoma not associated with Epstein-Barr virus. ANZ J Surg2011;81(
    9
    ):652653
  • 7
    Adachi S,
    Morimoto O,
    Kobayashi T.
    Lymphoepithelioma-like cholangiocarcinoma not associated with EBV. Pathol Int2008;58(
    1
    ):6974
  • 8
    Szekely E.
    Lymphoepithelioma-like cholangiocarcinoma (LELC) not associated with Epstein-Barr virus. Am J Surg Pathol2001;25(
    11
    ):14641466
  • 9
    Chen TC,
    Ng KF,
    Kuo T.
    Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with lymphoepithelioma-like component. Mod Pathol2001;14(
    5
    ):527532
  • 10
    Kim YB,
    Park YN,
    Han JY,
    Hong KC,
    Hwang TS.
    Biliary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma not associated with Epstein-Barr virus. Arch Pathol Lab Med1999;123(
    5
    ):441443
  • 11
    Tsai CC,
    Chen CL,
    Hsu HC.
    Expression of Epstein-Barr virus in carcinomas of major salivary glands: a strong association with lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma. Hum Pathol1996;27(
    3
    ):258262
  • 12
    Leyvraz S,
    Henle W,
    Chahinian AP,
    Perlmann C,
    Klein G,
    Gordon RE,
    et al
    . Association of Epstein-Barr virus with thymic carcinoma. N Engl J Med1985;312(
    20
    ):12961299
  • 13
    Onizuka M,
    Doi M,
    Mitsui K,
    Ogata T,
    Hori M.
    Undifferentiated carcinoma with prominent lymphocytic infiltration (so-called lymphoepithelioma) in the trachea. Chest1990;98(
    1
    ):236237
  • 14
    Castro CY,
    Ostrowski ML,
    Barrios R,
    Green LK,
    Popper HH,
    Powell S
    et al
    . Relationship between Epstein-Barr virus and lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of the lung: a clinicopathologic study of 6 cases and review of the literature. Hum Pathol2001;32(
    8
    ):863872
  • 15
    Chen PC,
    Pan CC,
    Hsu WH,
    Ka HJ,
    Yang AH.
    Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of the esophagus. Hum Pathol2003;34(
    4
    ):407411
  • 16
    Shibata D,
    Tokunaga M,
    Uemura Y,
    Sato E,
    Tanaka S,
    Weiss LM.
    Association of Epstein-Barr virus with undifferentiated gastric carcinomas with intense lymphoid infiltration: lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma. Am J Pathol1991;139(
    3
    ):469474
  • 17
    Dinney CP,
    Ro JY,
    Babaian RJ,
    Johnson DE.
    Lymphoepithelioma of the bladder: a clinicopathological study of 3 cases. J Urol1993;149(
    4
    ):840841
  • 18
    Kohrenhagen N,
    Eck M,
    Holler S,
    Dietl J.
    Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of the uterine cervix: absence of Epstein-Barr virus and high-risk human papilloma virus infection. Arch Gynecol Obstet2008;277(
    2
    ):175178
  • 19
    Dietl J,
    Horny HP,
    Kaiserling E.
    Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of the vagina: a case report with special reference to the immunophenotype of the tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphoreticular cells. Int J Gynecol Pathol1994;13(
    2
    ):186189
  • 20
    Nemolato S,
    Fanni D,
    Naccarato AG,
    Ravarino A,
    Bevilacqua G,
    Faa G.
    Lymphoepitelioma-like hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report and a review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol2008;14(
    29
    ):46944696
  • 21
    Chen CJ,
    Jeng LB,
    Huang SF.
    Lymphoepithelioma-like hepatocellular carcinoma. Chang Gung Med J2007;30(
    2
    ):172177
  • 22
    Si MW,
    Thorson JA,
    Lauwers GY,
    DalCin P,
    Furman J.
    Hepatocellular lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma associated with epstein barr virus: a hitherto unrecognized entity. Diagn Mol Pathol2004;13(
    3
    ):183189
  • 23
    Emile JF,
    Adam R,
    Sebagh M,
    Marchadier E,
    Falissard B,
    Dussaix E
    et al
    . Hepatocellular carcinoma with lymphoid stroma: a tumour with good prognosis after liver transplantation. Histopathology2000;37(
    6
    ):523529
  • 24
    Ishida M,
    Mori T,
    Shiomi H,
    Naka S,
    Tsujikawa T,
    Andoh A
    et al
    . Non-Epstein-Barr virus associated lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of the inferior common bile duct. World J Gastrointest Oncol2011;3(
    7
    ):111115
  • 25
    Jeng YM,
    Chen CL,
    Hsu HC.
    Lymphoepithelioma-like cholangiocarcinoma: an Epstein-Barr virus-associated tumor. Am J Surg Pathol2001;25(
    4
    ):516520
  • 26
    Vortmeyer AO,
    Kingma DW,
    Fenton RG,
    Curti BD,
    Jaffe ES,
    Duray PH.
    Hepatobiliary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma associated with Epstein-Barr virus. Am J Clin Pathol1998;109(
    1
    ):9095
  • 27
    Hsu HC,
    Chen CC,
    Huang GT,
    Lee PH.
    Clonal Epstein-Barr virus associated cholangiocarcinoma with lymphoepithelioma-like component. Hum Pathol1996;27(
    8
    ):848850
  • 28
    Weiss LM,
    Movahed LA,
    Butler AE,
    Swanson SA,
    Frierson HF Jr,
    Cooper PH
    et al
    . Analysis of lymphoepithelioma and lymphoepithelioma-like carcinomas for Epstein-Barr viral genomes by in situ hybridization. Am J Surg Pathol1989;13(
    8
    ):625631
  • 29
    Weinberg E,
    Hoisington S,
    Eastman AY,
    Rice DK,
    Malfetano J,
    Ross JS.
    Uterine cervical lymphoepithelial-like carcinoma: absence of Epstein-Barr virus genomes. Am J Clin Pathol1993;99(
    2
    ):195199
  • 30
    El-Serag HB,
    Engels EA,
    Landgren O,
    Chiao E,
    Henderson L,
    Amaratunge HC
    et al
    . Risk of hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers after hepatitis C virus infection: a population-based study of U.S. veterans. Hepatology2009;49(
    1
    ):116123
  • 31
    Yamamoto S,
    Kubo S,
    Hai S,
    Uenishi T,
    Yamamoto T,
    Shuto T
    et al
    . Hepatitis C virus infection as a likely etiology of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Sci2004;95(
    7
    ):592595
  • 32
    Lee TY,
    Lee SS,
    Jung SW,
    Jeon SH,
    Yun SC,
    Oh HC
    et al
    . Hepatitis B virus infection and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Korea: a case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol2008;103(
    7
    ):17161720
  • 33
    Chen FF,
    Yan JJ,
    Lai WW,
    Jin YT,
    Su IJ.
    Epstein-Barr virus-associated nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: undifferentiated “lymphoepithelioma-like” carcinoma as a distinct entity with better prognosis. Cancer1998;82(
    12
    ):23342342
  • 34
    Matsunou H,
    Konishi F,
    Hori H,
    Ikeda T,
    Sasaki K,
    Hirose Y
    et al
    . Characteristics of Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric carcinoma with lymphoid stroma in Japan. Cancer1996;77(
    10
    ):19982004
  • 35
    El Rassi ZE,
    Partensky C,
    Scoazec JY,
    Henry L,
    Lombard-Bohas C,
    Maddern G.
    Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: presentation, diagnosis, pathology and management. Eur J Surg Oncol1999;25(
    4
    ):375380
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

CT images. (A) CT revealed a low-attenuation mass in the right hepatic anterior lobe and caudate lobe in the simple phase. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT showed a slightly enhanced mass (B) in the arterial phase, which washed out in the (C) portal phase and in the (D) delayed phase.


Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Magnetic resonance imaging showed that the hepatic mass appeared to be hypointense (A) on T1-weighted image and hyperintense on both (B) T2-weighted image and (C) diffusion-weighted image.


Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Macroscopic findings of the resected specimen. Image shows circumscribed, round, yellowish white, soft tumor.


Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Histologic specimen of liver tumor. (A) The neoplasm was mainly composed of large undifferentiated epithelial cells with vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, indistinct cell borders, and heavy small lymphocytic infiltration. (B) Alcian blue staining was positive in epithelial lining. (C) Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated positivity for cytokeratin 19. (D) Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated negativity for glypican 3.


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author: Suefumi Aosasa, Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, 3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359-8513, Japan. Tel.: +81 4 2995 1637; Fax: +81 4 2996 5205; E-mail: suaosasa@ndmc.ac.jp
  • Download PDF